Throughout their medical studies, future doctors spend most of their time learning and studying the inner workings of the human body in order to pass their examinations, so that one day they may be able to accomplish that always daunting task already pursued by their predecessors to serve humanity, to restore normal health, To eradicate diseases, to prevent their occurrence, explain diseases to patients and stay out of prison. However, once in practice, the physician may one day be called upon to assess the medico-legal aspects of a case in his or her practice or that of a colleague, which may never have been demonstrated during medical school. There are cases where test results are not received by the prescribing physician. In other cases, patients do not perform the tests as directed or the results are filed before the doctor examines them and the patient is not informed of the results. It is important that physicians and their staff are able to track the status of these prescriptions to ensure that none are overlooked or forgotten. Another aspect of care that requires better follow-up is referral to specialists. Each step must be documented, not only to avoid medico-legal problems, but also for good patient care. [11] The world of forensic expertise can be both medically beneficial for the applicant and a compelling and interesting medical practice for the expert. A well-done expertise that includes accurate medical information and gives objective and clear answers to the questions asked usually determines the right path for an injured worker after an injury and can thus serve as a liberating and even therapeutic force. The art and science of medicine come together to illuminate the arena of social justice.

CMO write this person 100% visually stimulating so why not for medical legal cases. Medico-legal certificate, issued after all physical examinations and this certificate of disability is issued after all eye tests, which confuses in the mind of the CMO that he does not write for medical legal purposes The doctor who gives “expert opinions” becomes known as an “expert”, not so much because he has all the recognizable awards or has performed brilliantly on the medical scene in his field, But because he has the necessary training and experience and is expected to know everything there is to know about the medical side of the matter at hand, he is expected to be available, willing and able to explain the issues on paper and, if necessary, as a witness in court. While in court, he must also be willing to discuss certain contentious issues arising from the case, while addressing members of the legal profession and defending his opinion if refuted by equivalent “experts” for the opposition. At all times, he must remain focused and informative and not let his personal feelings invade his considerations. He is there at the request of the court and must remember to address his words to the judge who will finally make the final decision. His main objective is not necessarily to crush the opposition, but to adequately represent the medical interests of his client. No for medico-legal purposes means that this certificate is not issued as proof of documents for medico-legal cases, but as a joint certificate for general purposes. Within the limit of the quota for physically handicapped persons, this person may request a relaxation of the qualifications to which any other candidate is subject. The “non-medical” scribble does not change the legal nature of the certificate.

For physicians, it is essential to develop an asset protection plan in addition to professional liability insurance. A malpractice lawsuit not only reduces a physician`s ability to make a living in medicine, but can also harm or destroy assets earned and invested. There are two categories of professional liability, such as personal or individual liability: This bears the liability risk of the doctor and his qualified assistant. Errors and Omissions Policy: This policy applies to an institution, nursing home or hospital and its staff. If a physician owns a hospital or facility, it is recommended to establish both an individual policy and an error policy, as the hospital or facility is a separate legal entity and can often be a party to a medico-legal matter. [7] If the treating physician does not document that something happened, it is difficult to prove that it happened. An accurate and complete account can help understand what happened to the patient. In addition, it will help answer due diligence questions if a filing is called months or years after an event. You cannot rely on their memory when it comes to the facts.

Regardless of the system used, the purpose of documentation from a legal perspective is always to accurately and comprehensively record patient care and response to that care. Documentation has legal credibility if it is timely, accurate, truthful and appropriate. [20] First, you must exhaust the remedies of its higher authorities in this regard, and after that, only you can legally deal with this matter. Mediaco Legal Purpose means not to be used in litigation. The certificate is not for medico-legal purposes. It was issued for all general purposes, so this certificate can be used as documentary evidence in court. Medico-legal remedies if they are issued for legal purposes only and cannot be used for general purposes. The purpose of a medico-legal dispute is to be able to convince the judge that you have a better argument than the opposition, in short, to win the argument based on more credible evidence. The reason there has been a legal debate is that the issues are controversial (gray instead of black or white).

While the doctor`s main job is to clearly explain the medical side of things, the lawyer`s job is to argue for his client and win the argument in points. The lawyer relies on the doctor to provide him with the necessary medical information, which he integrates into a legal thesis that he hopes will convince the arbitral tribunal of the accuracy of his testimony on behalf of his client. The idea is that neither the doctor nor the lawyer should see themselves as individuals, but as members of a team of investigators and interpreters who work together to shed light on the true nature of the dispute, to allow the judge to be well informed, to weigh the arguments, to see the truth and to find his side. Hard and honest work and common sense usually provide the tools to build a successful case. Teamwork is essential, neither the doctor nor the lawyer tries to surpass themselves. Winning for the customer is key. The predetermined rules of the legal system, which have already been established and improved over the years, if properly nourished and well-oiled, will provide the energy needed to complete the case and allow for an orderly and convincing presentation of the facts. Regardless of the quality of the arguments, the final decision always rests with the judge or jury. If a party feels justice has been denied, there is always the appeal process to rely on. But various court cases judge justice does not give any advantage as such a type of certificate, when this type of judgment “does not exist for medico-legal purposes” or for non-legal purposes.

Medical Council of India, New Delhi, which governs all Indian public hospitals, give the Act of 2002 where point 7.7 states that any medical certificate or type of certificate issued by doctors may be used for judicial or administrative purposes if it is not possible that the medical or other certificates are false, Misleading. If the person has been 100% visually impaired, then what is a disability certificate that is not admissible for medico-legal purposes or cannot be considered as evidence in any court case? The Supreme Court has cautioned police against arresting or harassing doctors unless the facts clearly meet the parameters established in the Jacob Mathew case. The police were even threatened that if they did not comply with these orders, they would have to count themselves in legal action. The Supreme Court continued: “To sue a physician for negligence, it must be proved that the defendant did or omitted to do something that no physician in his usual sense and prudence would have done or omitted to do in the given facts and circumstances. The danger that the accused physician accepts should be such that the resulting injury was most likely imminent. [30] The Supreme Court has sought to allay fears that prevent health care professionals from fulfilling their duty to a person who is suffering. No for medico-legal purposes means that the document cannot be read as evidence in court. This does not prevent a person from using it for any purpose.